>As for Japanese emperor.
Korean media misinterpreted and distorted his words that the Japanese emperor is a descendant of Korean royal,
>but truth is, Japanese Emperor Kōnin’s concubine was descended from the Baekje royal family. And that’s all.
Except it,,There is no any primary evidence suggesting the connection of japanese imperial family and Korean ancient kingdoms.
It did not say that the first emperor was from Baekje.
but truth is, Japanese Emperor Kōnin’s concubine was descended from the Baekje royal family.
Baekje royal family is the distant ancestors of the mother of Emperor Kanmu (50th generation). However, His father is Emperor Konin(49th generation) and his ancestor is all Japanese. Baekje royal family are not direct ancestor of Japanese emperor family. Japanese Emperor’s direct ancestor is 27th Emperor Keitai whose existence is considered to be certain. He is Japanese from today’s shiga prefecture. And they are clearly WA(yayoi) japonic race and not a nothern Koreanic speakers. I don’t know why some Koreans are proud of that fact although the all emperors are Japanese
HOWEVER,
>There is all of hard evidence that straight blood line of Beakje Royal family became under the rull of Japanese and they are treated lowest rank. “蕃客 barbarians guest”.
>So even from this single fact suggests that yamato japanese was not Beakje.
>Do you seriously believe that japanese will treat own direct imperial family line as 蕃客 barbarians guests?
royal family of Beakje went to japan after destruction of Beakje by the war between Beakje and Silla. and being under the imperial family of japan and being one of the clan of japan (kudara no konishiki clan).
The Kudara no Konikishi ( 百済王) was a Japanese clan whose founder Zenkō (善光 or 禅広) was a son of King Uija, the last king of Baekje in southwestern Korea.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudara_no_Konikishi_clan
>also Summary of ancient Korea and Peninsular Japonic history.
At ancient peninsula there were Japonic speaking people who had water rice cultivation culture was living as
>MUMON people aka Penisular Japonic aka WA JIN
(Direct ancienter of modern japanese as later became Yayoi)
Wajin had culture of having full of tatoo on the face and body as sea oriented people which Korean and Chinese never did. And they were speaking ancient Japonic language which is different language of Koreanic language.
Mumon people(wa jin) was gradually gathered at southern part of peninsula and being
>the ancient state of Jin
Gradually, Nothern Buyeo/Yemaek people gathered at nothern part of peninsula and it became
>Goguryeo
Buyeo/Yemaek people came to southern part of peninsula and mixed with local Jin Japonic and it became
>Mahan and Byeonhan
Later, the Hann people (not chinese Han) who escaped from the the slavery work of Han Chinese, Asked Muhan to give the land for them. Muhan provided the land for Hann People and it became
>Jinhan
And this Mahan, Byeonhan, Jinhan are
>ancient samhann
And
Noble family of Goguryeo settled in Muhan and it became
> Beakje
Jinhan of Haan people became
>Silla (direct ancienter of modern Korean)
And include the Goguryeo, Those Three are called
>Samhann
>Three hann
And
Byeonhan became
>Gaya/Kaya
Gaya is not considered as Samhaan.
Gaya had still a lot of Japonic people and solo recorded Gaya language was Japonic
Also current survey founded the facts that revealed Northeastern Asian and Jomon-related genetic structure in the Three Kingdoms period of Gimhae GAYA, Korea
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.004
>one of jomon related person was noble class in Gaya
And Japonic people Who moved to Japanese island was called
>YAYOI
And this is
>IMMIGRATION OF YAYOI ERA
Yayoi Japonic people who went to archoipelago was gradually gathered and mixed with local jomon people and becomeing
>YAMATO
Yamato allied with Gaya and Beakje
So it means Peninsular Japonic people (Wa jin) and Koreanic people(hann jin) is two different people with different languages and cultures.
https://www.reddit.com/r/japan/comments/17uebnu/is_it_true_origin_of_imperial_family_of_japan_is/
13 comments
Are you asking us? Seems like you already made up your mind
Are you trying to convince us or yourself?
no, because they were born in the father’s land.
Just do a counter argument if you think something is wrong in first post.
Thank you so much or I’m sorry it happened to you. Too many words seeking conflict methinks
Probably not but could be. At a certain point, people had to come from the main continent. If that is through Korea or China, who knows?
What kind of life do you usually lead? Spend your time on more decent things.
Drinking?
TL;DR.
According to some, the Yayoi people were the result of people migrating from the continent, settling in Japan and mixing with the indigenous Jōmon people. The Imperial family could very well have the same background.
Op is just a new account spamming to get karma. Keep at 0
Funniest post ive ever read lmao imagine thinking korea is the true origin of imperial family of japan? Truly delusional lmaoooooo
*Wow That’s a Lotta Words, Too Bad I’m Not Reading ‘Em. * Heavy Metal Guitar Riff **
— Duke Nukem
“This question has been removed because it is soapboxing or otherwise a loaded question: it has the effect of promoting an existing interpretation or opinion at the expense of open-ended enquiry. Although we understand if you may have an existing interest in the topic, expressing a detailed opinion on the matter in your question is usually a sign that it is a loaded one, and we will remove questions that appear to put a deliberate slant on their subject or solicit answers that align with a specific pre-existing view.”